This is the year of the outsider. It’s the year of the insurgents; the year of Brexit, and Bernie, and Trump. That’s the political story of 2016. It’s been the story all along, and it remains the story. Don’t forget that. Except now, with only three weeks to go until the election, the establishment wants you to think otherwise. And it might be working.
As we head into the home stretch of this electoral season a series of curious events are unfolding.
Disarming the police will leave us unprotected and defenseless against danger, but words will never hurt us.
Limiting the right to free speech by citing, “political correctness” stunts intellectual growth and will catapult us into a totalitarian regime that our country has never seen before, but words will never hurt us.
Agitating a race war will tear our country apart and cost countless innocent lives, but words will never hurt us.
A young Catholic millennial woman, Kayla Adanalian, recently made us aware of an excellent piece she wrote about accountability. She, unlike many of her generation, is not fooled by the media/ left freak out over Trump while exhibiting zero outrage over Hillary’s crimes. Despite Hillary and the media’s propaganda campaign, this young Catholic woman gives us hope for the election and the future. There are young women out there who see Hillary’s last second smear campaign for what it is and also recognize the real vital issues at stake in this election. With permission we are republishing Ms. Adanalian’s piece below. It can also be found on her blog which we encourage you to check out at: https://kaylaadanalian.wordpress.com/2016/10/13/the-fear-of-accountability/
Sound shocking? It’s not. It is simply the only conclusion one comes to when one looks at the principles and moral laws involved. As a guide, we will be quoting from ‘The Moral Obligation of Voting” written by the Rev. Titus Cranny, S.A, M.A, S.T.L in 1952. As Fr. Cranny states:
Yesterday, Donald Trump posted a very classy tribute video to Mother Teresa on her canonization day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TQgm2jr46o
In contrast, Hillary’s surrogate newspaper, the Washington Post, took the occasion of Mother Teresa’s canonization to publish a disgusting attack piece against the Catholic Saint:
In India, where Teresa carried out the majority of her work, that legacy was called into question last year, when the head of the Hindu nationalist group Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) sparked outrage by criticizing her intentions.
“It’s good to work for a cause with selfless intentions. But Mother Teresa’s work had ulterior motive, which was to convert the person who was being served to Christianity,” RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat said at the opening of an orphanage in Rajasthan state in February 2015, the Times of India reported. “In the name of service, religious conversions were made. This was followed by other institutes, too.”
Hillary Clinton: ” I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision,” …“I am really in awe of her, there are a lot of lessons we can learn from her life”
So spoke Hillary Clinton upon receiving a Margaret Sanger award from Planned Parenthood in 2009. But who is Margaret Sanger?
Arina Grossu wrote the following in a Washington Times article entitled, “Margaret Sanger, racist eugenicist extraordinaire“:
If you can only send your conservative, pro-life, Christian friends one article to try to convince them to vote for Trump this November, this one is it. Share it far and wide! It comes from Wayne Grudem written for Townhall and it is excellent. We were going to try to compile an article just like this one cataloguing the horrors of a Clinton presidency one by one. Thankfully, Mr. Grudem did all of our work for us. If this does not convince every pro-life conservative Christian to vote Trump in November, I don’t know what will.
Excerpts from Mr. Grudem’s piece are below. If you only read one persuasive article to vote against Hillary Clinton this election season, make sure this is it:
The following piece by Hugh Hewitt, a former Trump critic, is a must read for all #Nevertrumpers. Hewitt breaks the case down to three elements. The most important is the courts. This is something most people simply do not understand. While Hillary’s team and their complicit media are presenting a Khizr Kahn dog and pony show to distract the public, the damage Hillary could do with her judicial appointments would, in the words of Obama, “fundamentally transform America” forever. Be warned.
The following is from Hewitt’s new piece in the Washington Examiner:
Just when we thought Hillary could not get any stranger or more repulsive to orthodox Christians we find this. Bill Clinton said the following on October 17, 2012, during the dedication of Franklin D. Roosevelt Four Freedoms Park:
A special thanks to the members of the Roosevelt family who are here. And the one who is not, Eleanor, who made sure that the four freedoms were included in the preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. I know that because, as all of you famously learned when I served as president, my wife, now the secretary of state, was known to commune with Eleanor on a regular basis. And so she called me last night on her way home from Peru to remind me to say that. That Eleanor had talked to her and reminded her that I should say that.
Speaker after speaker at the Democratic convention have now railed for four days about ensuring “equal pay for equal work.” This is puzzling since every Democrat in recent memory has vowed to fix this problem in their administration. We’ve now had close to 16 combined years of Democratic presidents since 1992, but still somehow the “gender pay gap” is not fixed. Now Hillary Clinton in 2016 is the latest Democratic nominee vowing to fix it.
But isn’t this the modus operandi of Democrats? They play up problems that only they can solve, but yet they are somehow never solved. For if they were solved, you’d have no reason to vote for them. One of the problems they play up is discrimination. If you listen to the Democrats at the convention, you would think we are living under Sharia law the way they imply companies are blatantly paying men one wage for doing the exact same job and a woman another. But is this true?
Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén